Introduction

1. Understanding Vibration and Impact Testing in PCB Reliability

Printed circuit boards (PCBs) are at the heart of nearly every modern electronic device, from consumer gadgets to aerospace control systems. While design engineers often focus on electrical performance, thermal management, or signal integrity, the mechanical resilience of a PCB is just as critical for long-term reliability. A product that works perfectly in the lab but fails after weeks of vibration in the field can cause enormous financial and reputational damage. This is where Vibration and Impact Testing enters the picture as an indispensable methodology in the lifecycle of PCB development.

The Definition of Vibration and Impact Testing

Vibration and Impact Testing refers to a set of standardized procedures designed to simulate the mechanical stresses that a PCB might experience during shipping, handling, installation, or actual operation. Unlike static load tests that measure structural strength under a single applied force, vibration and impact tests introduce dynamic mechanical energy into the system.

• Vibration testing subjects the PCB to oscillatory motion, typically across a wide frequency spectrum, to reveal resonant modes, solder joint fatigue, and potential micro-cracking in laminates.

• Impact testing, on the other hand, evaluates how well a PCB withstands sudden mechanical shocks, such as drops, accidental strikes, or abrupt accelerations common in automotive or aerospace environments.

Taken together, these methods expose hidden weaknesses that would not manifest under normal bench-top validation.

Historical Development of Vibration and Impact Testing

The need for Vibration and Impact Testing emerged alongside the miniaturization and globalization of electronics. In the early 20th century, electronic assemblies were bulky, housed in large enclosures, and rarely moved once installed. Failures due to vibration were minimal because systems were overbuilt. However, as electronics became portable—first in radios, then in personal computers, smartphones, and automotive controllers—the risk of mechanical fatigue increased dramatically.

Military and aerospace industries were among the first to institutionalize vibration and impact qualification. Standards such as MIL-STD-810 laid out testing requirements to ensure that avionics and defense electronics could survive extreme transport and battlefield conditions. Over time, these practices filtered down into civilian industries, influencing IEC and JEDEC testing protocols. Today, even consumer electronics undergo some form of vibration and impact evaluation before mass production.

Industry Standards and Compliance Requirements

For manufacturers, compliance with established standards is both a necessity and a marketing advantage. Vibration and Impact Testing is not simply a matter of shaking or dropping a PCB arbitrarily; it must follow defined test profiles that replicate real-world stresses as accurately as possible.

Some relevant standards include:

• IEC 60068-2 series: Defines vibration, shock, and bump tests for electronic components.

• JEDEC JESD22-B103/B104: Specifies mechanical shock and vibration test methods for semiconductor devices and packaged assemblies.

• MIL-STD-810: Covers a wide range of environmental tests, including vibration and shock for defense and aerospace hardware.

• ASTM D4169: Simulates distribution and transportation hazards, critical for PCBs shipped worldwide.

Compliance with these standards is not only about product survival but also about customer confidence. Clients in automotive, medical, or aerospace sectors often require proof of rigorous testing before approving a supplier.

Common Failure Modes Revealed

One of the most important contributions of Vibration and Impact Testing is that it reveals latent defects that electrical testing alone cannot identify. Some frequent failure modes include:

1. Solder joint cracking – Continuous vibration at resonant frequencies fatigues solder joints, leading to open circuits.

2. Delamination of PCB layers – Repeated mechanical stress causes internal separation between laminate layers, compromising reliability.

3. Component detachment – Heavy components such as transformers or connectors can detach due to shock or vibration.

4. Micro-cracks in copper traces – Although invisible under standard inspection, these cracks can propagate under field use, leading to intermittent or permanent failure.

5. Connector loosening – PCBs with high pin-count connectors are particularly vulnerable to mechanical stress.

These examples underscore why companies cannot rely on functional testing alone.

The Value of Testing Early

One of the key insights from decades of practice is that Vibration and Impact Testing is most effective when integrated early into the design cycle. Many organizations make the mistake of leaving mechanical reliability testing until late-stage validation. At that point, design revisions are costly and disruptive.

By running vibration simulations and small-batch tests during prototyping, engineers can:

• Identify weak solder joints and redesign footprints.

• Choose reinforced laminates or thicker copper foils where needed.

• Add mechanical support for heavy components.

This proactive approach reduces the risk of catastrophic failures after product launch.

 The Hidden Weakness Factor

From my perspective, one of the most underappreciated aspects of Vibration and Impact Testing is its ability to uncover issues that are invisible under normal inspection. I have encountered cases where PCBs passed 100% electrical testing and thermal stress screening, only to fail catastrophically in the field due to unseen solder fatigue.

This underscores a truth that every design engineer must embrace: a PCB is not only an electrical network but also a mechanical structure. Treating it purely as an electrical artifact is a recipe for unexpected failures. By integrating vibration and impact evaluations, companies shift from reactive firefighting to proactive assurance.

2. Why Vibration and Impact Testing Matters in PCB Manufacturing

The global PCB industry has grown into a trillion-dollar ecosystem supporting everything from consumer electronics to mission-critical aerospace systems. While electrical performance, miniaturization, and cost reduction remain key drivers, the mechanical durability of PCBs is increasingly recognized as a decisive factor in long-term reliability. Vibration and Impact Testing directly addresses this need by ensuring that printed circuit boards do not simply pass initial functional checks but remain resilient throughout their operational life.

The Growing Importance of Mechanical Reliability

Modern PCBs are far more complex than their predecessors. They feature:

• Higher component densities, with fine-pitch ball grid arrays (BGAs) and microvia interconnects.

• Diverse materials, including high-speed laminates, flexible substrates, and embedded passives.

• Thinner board profiles, often designed to reduce weight and size in portable electronics.

While these advancements enable performance gains, they also reduce the mechanical margin for error. A thin, high-density PCB is far more susceptible to vibration-induced fatigue or impact-related cracking than the overbuilt boards of the past.

This makes Vibration and Impact Testing not a luxury, but a necessity.

Common Failure Modes Revealed in Manufacturing

During manufacturing and shipping, PCBs encounter stresses that can be destructive long before they are assembled into final products. Some hidden vulnerabilities that testing uncovers include:

1. Weak solder joints from reflow profiles – If reflow soldering introduces voids or incomplete wetting, the joint may appear electrically sound but can crack under repetitive vibration.

2. Layer adhesion issues – In multilayer PCBs, poor lamination can lead to early delamination when subjected to repeated impact.

3. Plated through-hole weakness – Micro-cracks in vias may propagate under resonance conditions.

4. Board warpage during curing – Warped boards may amplify vibration stresses on edge-mounted connectors.

5. Heavy component strain – Transformers, relays, or shielded inductors exert concentrated stress on solder pads.

By simulating vibration and impact early, these weaknesses are identified before mass production, saving enormous rework costs.

Real-World Case Studies

To highlight why Vibration and Impact Testing is essential, let’s consider a few illustrative cases:

Case 1: Automotive ECU Failure

An automotive company introduced a new engine control unit (ECU). Lab validation focused heavily on temperature cycling and electrical performance. However, after vehicles were deployed in the field, failure rates spiked within six months. Investigation revealed micro-cracks in solder joints of ceramic capacitors, caused by sustained vibration from the engine bay. The cost of recall exceeded $50 million.

Had Vibration and Impact Testing been integrated, the solder weakness would have been detected early, avoiding financial and reputational damage.

Case 2: Aerospace Navigation Module

An aerospace supplier developed a navigation PCB designed for satellite payloads. Given the launch environment’s extreme vibration profile, they subjected prototypes to random vibration and shock tests. Failures emerged in corner-mounted connectors, prompting a redesign that added mechanical reinforcement. The final product survived multiple launches without issue, proving the decisive role of proactive testing.

Case 3: Consumer Smartphone Board

A smartphone manufacturer introduced an ultra-thin mainboard to save weight. Early drop tests (a form of impact testing) revealed that microvias under BGAs were failing after repeated drops from waist height. The company adjusted the copper plating thickness and added corner stiffeners. Without this step, warranty returns could have skyrocketed.

These examples show that Vibration and Impact Testing is not optional—it is insurance against catastrophic losses.

Contribution to Product Lifecycle Reliability

From a broader perspective, Vibration and Impact Testing contributes to multiple phases of the product lifecycle:

1. Design phase – Provides critical feedback to improve component layout and material choices.

2. Prototyping – Validates whether design intent translates to real-world mechanical resilience.

3. Production – Serves as a quality control checkpoint, ensuring process consistency.

4. Field operation – Reduces failures, enhances customer satisfaction, and extends product lifetime.

Reliability, after all, is not a one-time achievement but a continuous process of validation.

Preventing Costly Recalls

One of the most compelling arguments for Vibration and Impact Testing is its economic benefit. Field failures are the most expensive kind of defect because they involve:

• Repair or replacement costs.

• Logistics and recall coordination.

• Damage to brand reputation.

• Potential legal or compliance penalties.

According to studies, the cost of fixing a defect after shipment can be up to 100 times higher than correcting it during the design phase. By investing in vibration and impact qualification early, manufacturers mitigate risks that could otherwise lead to financial disaster.

Building Customer Confidence

For industries like aerospace, automotive, and medical electronics, customers demand evidence that products can withstand mechanical stress. Passing Vibration and Impact Testing becomes part of the marketing narrative:

• Automotive clients seek assurance that in-vehicle electronics survive a decade of engine vibration.

• Aerospace clients require qualification for launch stress and long-term orbital reliability.

• Medical device manufacturers need confidence that PCBs in implants or diagnostic tools won’t fail due to minor shocks.

Compliance certificates and test reports provide tangible proof, strengthening supplier–customer trust.

Testing as a Cultural Mindset

In my experience, the companies that excel at reliability do not treat Vibration and Impact Testing as a “check-box” exercise. Instead, they adopt it as part of a cultural mindset—a belief that reliability is as important as functionality.

I’ve observed that when teams view testing as an investment rather than a burden, the outcomes change dramatically. Instead of scrambling to fix failures at the last minute, they build reliability into the DNA of the product.

This cultural shift also enhances collaboration across design, materials, and manufacturing teams. Testing becomes a learning tool rather than merely a validation hurdle.

3. Methods of Vibration and Impact Testing for PCBs

Vibration and Impact Testing is not a single test, but a suite of methodologies designed to replicate different types of mechanical stresses encountered by printed circuit boards throughout their lifecycle. From controlled sinusoidal sweeps to highly randomized shock profiles, each method reveals unique aspects of PCB weakness. Understanding the nuances of these methods is essential for both engineers and manufacturers to design resilient products.

Sinusoidal Vibration Testing

Definition and Purpose
Sinusoidal vibration testing exposes a PCB to oscillatory motion at a single frequency that changes gradually over time. The primary goal is to identify resonant frequencies, where the board or its components vibrate with amplified motion. Resonance often leads to mechanical fatigue or catastrophic failure if not accounted for in design.

Procedure

• The PCB is mounted on a shaker table.

• Frequencies are swept across a defined range (e.g., 10 Hz to 2,000 Hz).

• Acceleration levels (measured in g’s) are controlled to simulate expected environments.

• Duration of exposure ensures sufficient stress cycles to reveal weaknesses.

Applications

• Aerospace: validating PCBs for satellite or aircraft avionics.

• Automotive: ensuring engine control units survive repetitive engine vibration.

• Consumer devices: identifying structural weaknesses in slim PCBs.

Advantages

• Pinpoints resonance frequencies precisely.

• Helps in structural redesign (adding stiffeners, changing mounting).

• Relatively straightforward and standardized.

Limitations

• Does not fully capture real-world randomness.

• May underrepresent combined stresses (temperature + vibration).

Reflection
From my perspective, sinusoidal testing is like a spotlight—it shines intensely on one variable at a time. While it doesn’t capture the chaos of the real world, it provides a clear diagnosis of weak spots, which is invaluable during prototyping.

---

Random Vibration Testing

Definition and Purpose
Random vibration testing subjects the PCB to a wide spectrum of frequencies simultaneously, replicating real-world vibration environments such as vehicle movement, aerospace launches, or shipping conditions.

Procedure

• A random vibration profile (RMS acceleration values across frequencies) is generated.

• The PCB is mounted to a vibration table equipped with accelerometers.

• Exposure durations simulate years of real-world operation in hours.

Applications

• Automotive: replicating road-induced vibrations.

• Industrial: ensuring PCBs withstand machinery-induced vibration.

• Consumer: simulating courier shipping and handling.

Advantages

• Closer representation of real-world stress.

• Can be tailored to specific environments (engine bay vs. spacecraft payload).

• Useful for accelerated life testing.

Limitations

• Complex to interpret—failures may occur without clear frequency attribution.

• Requires more advanced equipment and statistical analysis.

Reflection
Random vibration testing, in my view, is like throwing the PCB into the storm—it forces the design to withstand chaotic, multidirectional forces. For reliability, this test is one of the most realistic.

---

Mechanical Shock Testing

Definition and Purpose
Mechanical shock testing evaluates the PCB’s response to sudden, high-energy impacts. Unlike vibration, which is cyclical, shock introduces an instantaneous stress pulse, similar to what happens during drops, collisions, or abrupt accelerations.

Procedure

• The PCB is mounted on a shock test machine.

• A defined pulse (half-sine, trapezoidal, or sawtooth) is applied.

• Acceleration levels can range from 10 g to several thousand g’s.

Applications

• Military and aerospace electronics during launch or weapon deployment.

• Automotive crash-related electronics.

• Consumer electronics drop or handling accidents.

Advantages

• Reveals weaknesses in heavy components and connectors.

• Tests solder joint ductility under sudden load.

• Identifies brittle fracture risks.

Limitations

• Does not account for long-term fatigue (focuses on single or repeated pulses).

• High risk of over-testing (pushing beyond realistic conditions).

Reflection
Shock testing, to me, is a reality check. No matter how refined a PCB design is, a sudden jolt can undo months of engineering effort. The insight it provides—especially regarding component anchoring—is priceless.

---

Drop Testing

Definition and Purpose
Drop testing is a specialized form of impact evaluation, particularly critical for portable electronics such as smartphones, laptops, and wearables. It examines how well the PCB endures real-world drops from typical handling heights.

Procedure

• Devices or bare boards are dropped from defined heights (commonly 1–1.5 meters).

• Orientation varies (flat, edge, corner).

• Post-drop, boards undergo functional and structural inspection.

Applications

• Consumer electronics: phones, tablets, laptops.

• Medical handheld devices.

• Industrial handheld controllers.

Advantages

• Simple and intuitive.

• Strong correlation with user-experience failures.

• Detects brittle fractures and connector loosening.

Limitations

• Inconsistent repeatability due to natural randomness of drop.

• Primarily relevant to handheld products.

Reflection
Drop testing is perhaps the most relatable to non-engineers. Everyone has dropped their phone; everyone has seen the consequences. Including it in the reliability validation suite adds credibility when communicating with end customers.

---

Accelerated Life Testing

Definition and Purpose
Accelerated life testing (ALT) combines vibration, shock, and environmental factors (temperature, humidity) to simulate years of wear within a compressed timeframe. Its goal is to predict long-term durability and uncover gradual degradation mechanisms.

Procedure

• The PCB undergoes combined stresses (e.g., random vibration + thermal cycling).

• Test duration is mapped to simulated years of operation.

• Failures are analyzed for root causes.

Applications

• Mission-critical aerospace and military electronics.

• Automotive systems expected to last over a decade.

• Industrial equipment in harsh conditions.

Advantages

• Provides comprehensive durability prediction.

• Accelerates discovery of gradual fatigue issues.

• Enables reliability modeling and lifetime forecasting.

Limitations

• Requires sophisticated equipment.

• Correlation to actual field conditions must be validated.

• Can be resource-intensive.

Reflection
Accelerated life testing, in my experience, is a crystal ball. While not perfect, it gives engineers a glimpse into the future, allowing them to anticipate failures before they ever reach the customer.

---

Integrating Methods for Complete Reliability

Each testing method reveals different layers of PCB weakness. The most robust approach integrates them:

• Use sinusoidal vibration to identify resonance.

• Apply random vibration to simulate field conditions.

• Add shock and drop tests for sudden stresses.

• Use accelerated life testing to forecast longevity.

By combining tests, engineers ensure that the PCB is not just strong in one dimension but resilient across its entire expected operating spectrum.

4. Advantages of Vibration and Impact Testing for PCB Performance

Reliability is no longer an afterthought in PCB manufacturing—it is a competitive differentiator. With devices deployed in increasingly harsh environments, manufacturers must ensure that every circuit board maintains performance under stress. Vibration and Impact Testing provides a unique set of advantages that go beyond detecting flaws; it actively drives improvements in design, material selection, and lifecycle durability.

Improved Structural Resilience

One of the primary benefits of Vibration and Impact Testing is that it enhances the structural resilience of the PCB.

• Solder Joints: Fatigue cracks are among the most common failure points. Testing reveals weak joints, prompting redesigns of pad geometries, reflow profiles, or solder alloys.

• Copper Traces: Thin traces in high-density designs may develop micro-cracks. Testing uncovers these vulnerabilities, ensuring designers reinforce critical signal paths.

• Substrate Integrity: Multilayer laminates can delaminate under stress. Testing validates lamination processes, adhesives, and materials.

Ultimately, structural reinforcement translates into lower field failures and extended product life.

Enhanced Solder Joint Integrity

Solder joints are the weakest link in many PCBs because they combine dissimilar materials (metal–ceramic–organic) with different coefficients of expansion. Under vibration or impact, these joints act as stress concentrators.

• Lead-free solders, now widely used due to RoHS compliance, are more brittle than leaded solders, making vibration testing even more critical.

• Ball grid arrays (BGAs) and chip-scale packages (CSPs) rely on tiny solder balls that are particularly vulnerable to fatigue.

• Surface-mounted connectors can loosen if not reinforced.

By subjecting assemblies to realistic vibration and shock, manufacturers can identify joint designs that fail prematurely and correct them before large-scale deployment.

Better Component Retention Under Stress

Components with high mass—such as inductors, transformers, or shielded modules—are prone to detachment during mechanical shock. Vibration and Impact Testing reveals whether:

• Mechanical supports like epoxy staking or underfill are necessary.

• Connector retention features need reinforcement.

• Orientation of components on the board affects survivability.

This leads to more robust assemblies, especially for applications like automotive control units or aerospace avionics, where heavy components are unavoidable.

Long-Term Reliability in Harsh Environments

Boards that survive Vibration and Impact Testing are proven to withstand environments such as:

• Automotive engine bays with continuous vibration and temperature cycling.

• Aircraft cockpits exposed to turbulence and G-forces.

• Industrial machinery where boards face repetitive vibration from motors.

• Portable consumer devices subject to repeated drops.

By validating reliability in advance, companies can extend warranties confidently and reduce long-term service costs.

Contribution to Material Selection

Another advantage is that testing guides material choices. For example:

• High-Tg laminates may perform better under vibration compared to standard FR4.

• Rolled copper foil provides superior mechanical fatigue resistance than electrolytic copper foil (FAQ #1 already explained this difference).

• Adhesive systems with higher bonding strength reduce risk of delamination.

This knowledge feeds directly into design-for-reliability practices.

Economic and Competitive Benefits

While testing requires investment, its economic benefits outweigh costs:

• Reduced recalls and warranty claims – A single avoided recall can save millions.

• Higher customer confidence – Certifications backed by mechanical testing increase trust.

• Faster market acceptance – Products with proven resilience often win contracts in aerospace and automotive sectors.

From a business perspective, Vibration and Impact Testing is not just quality control—it is a strategic asset.

Reflection: Turning Weakness Into Strength

One of my strongest reflections is that testing transforms weaknesses into strengths.

When boards fail during vibration testing, engineers might initially view this as a setback. But every revealed weakness is an opportunity to improve design. Over time, this process builds institutional knowledge—companies learn where their designs are vulnerable and how to reinforce them.

In my view, organizations that embrace failures during testing as lessons—rather than threats—become the ones that consistently deliver market-leading reliability.

Common Pitfalls in Vibration and Impact Testing and How to Avoid Them

Even though Vibration and Impact Testing provides significant benefits, many companies face challenges when implementing these methods. Recognizing and avoiding common pitfalls is essential to ensure accurate and reliable test outcomes.

1. Inadequate Test Profile Definition
One of the most frequent mistakes is designing test profiles that do not accurately reflect real-world operating environments. For example, if an automotive PCB is tested only with random vibration but not exposed to actual road shock events, the results may create a false sense of reliability. To avoid this, test engineers must collect and analyze field data to develop profiles that truly represent the conditions the PCB will face.

2. Over-Testing Without Clear Objectives
Another pitfall occurs when PCBs are subjected to excessive vibration or impact levels beyond practical limits. While pushing components to failure has value, indiscriminate over-testing can waste resources without delivering actionable insights. The solution is to align test severity with customer specifications, industry standards, and product requirements.

3. Insufficient Fixture Design
Poorly designed test fixtures may introduce artificial stresses that distort test results. A flimsy fixture may amplify vibration modes or create unnatural resonances, leading to premature PCB failure. Engineers should carefully design fixtures to replicate actual mounting conditions, ensuring that failures represent genuine weaknesses in the PCB and not test setup errors.

4. Neglecting Post-Test Analysis
Some organizations focus too heavily on the test event itself and overlook post-test failure analysis. Without detailed inspection, engineers cannot determine whether cracks, solder fractures, or delamination occurred. Advanced inspection methods, such as X-ray imaging or scanning electron microscopy, are essential to identify the root cause of weaknesses revealed by testing.

5. Lack of Documentation and Repeatability
Testing without clear documentation or repeatable procedures reduces long-term value. If test results cannot be replicated, the data loses credibility. Companies must establish standardized protocols, record detailed logs, and maintain calibration of vibration and shock equipment to ensure reliability across multiple projects.

Avoiding these pitfalls maximizes the benefit of Vibration and Impact Testing and allows companies to convert raw test results into actionable design improvements.

Conclusion: The Strategic Role of Vibration and Impact Testing in PCB Reliability

Vibration and Impact Testing is not just a qualification step; it is a cornerstone of modern PCB reliability engineering. By exposing hidden weaknesses—whether in solder joints, substrates, vias, or component placements—these tests ensure that PCBs are not only electrically functional but also mechanically durable in real-world conditions.

From aerospace launches to automotive road shocks, from wearable device drops to heavy industrial vibrations, Vibration and Impact Testing provides engineers with the insights they need to design stronger, longer-lasting, and safer products. Its advantages extend beyond durability: it reduces warranty claims, accelerates compliance with global standards, and lowers lifecycle costs.

Equally important, testing data drives continuous design optimization. Each test cycle contributes knowledge that helps select better materials, refine layouts, and improve mechanical support strategies. As industries adopt AI, digital twins, and advanced simulation, the integration of Vibration and Impact Testing into design workflows will only deepen.

Companies that embrace this proactive approach not only prevent costly field failures but also strengthen their market position. For instance, suppliers like SQ PCB emphasize reliability testing as a built-in value, offering customers boards that are already validated for demanding environments. This type of partnership reduces risks for end-users and increases trust in critical applications.

Ultimately, the significance of Vibration and Impact Testing lies in its ability to bridge the gap between theoretical design and field reality. By revealing the unseen, it safeguards innovation, ensures safety, and sets the foundation for the next generation of high-performance, high-reliability PCBs.

 

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) about Vibration and Impact Testing

1. How does Vibration and Impact Testing differ from thermal cycling tests?
Vibration and Impact Testing evaluates mechanical resilience, focusing on dynamic stresses like oscillations, shocks, and drops. Thermal cycling, on the other hand, stresses PCBs through temperature changes, revealing issues such as material expansion mismatches, solder fatigue, and delamination. Both are complementary: thermal tests uncover thermal–mechanical weaknesses, while vibration tests expose purely mechanical vulnerabilities.

2. Can Vibration and Impact Testing be applied to flexible PCBs?
Yes. Flexible PCBs (FPCs) and rigid-flex boards undergo unique mechanical stresses due to their bendable nature. Vibration and Impact Testing for FPCs focuses on connector areas, solder joints, and regions with repeated bending. While FPCs generally absorb vibration better due to their flexibility, they are still vulnerable at rigid–flex transitions and soldered interfaces. Testing ensures these interfaces do not crack or delaminate under operational stress.

3. Can Vibration and Impact Testing replace thermal cycling or environmental testing?
No. Vibration and Impact Testing focuses on mechanical durability, while thermal cycling, humidity exposure, and other environmental tests address different failure mechanisms. Comprehensive reliability validation typically requires a combination of these methods to ensure PCBs perform well under multiple stresses.

4. What industries benefit most from Vibration and Impact Testing?
Industries where PCBs are exposed to mechanical stresses gain the most. This includes aerospace (rocket launches, avionics), automotive (engine vibration, road shocks), consumer electronics (smartphone drops, wearable bending), and industrial equipment (heavy machinery, renewable energy systems). Each industry uses tailored test profiles to simulate real-world stress conditions.

5. Why is fixture design so important in Vibration and Impact Testing?
A poorly designed test fixture can distort results by introducing artificial stress points or resonances not present in real-world mounting. Well-engineered fixtures replicate actual installation conditions, ensuring that failures revealed in testing accurately represent true PCB weaknesses.

our linkedin sqpcb.com